Jump to content
×
Are you looking for the BariatricPal Store? Go now!

Rant/Vent about Insurance



Recommended Posts

This is going to be long, so I apologize. I'm just frustrated. I'm almost 2 years post VSG and have developed a significant case of GERD. It's so severe, and not controlled by medication, that my surgeon feels we can't just let it go. He has recommended that I undergo a procedure called stretta, which seems promising. We submitted for approval to my insurance company which promptly rejected the request (took them all of 3 business days) on the grounds that the procedure is experimental and there are well accepted alternatives, including pharmaceutical therapy and Nissen Fundoplication. Well, I'm not controlled by medication and the only combination that provides any relief Protonix/Dexilant was already rejected by the Company (they won't pay for the Dexilant and at almost $400 a month, the cost is almost prohibitive). Also, given that I no longer have a fundus, a fundoplication isn't available to me (nice going insurance co . . . way to review my medical records). My final option is conversion to bypass, which I really don't want to do. Other than my GERD, I LOVE my sleeve. It's allowed me to lose 130lbs and live an active lifestyle I've only dreamed about. I like having my pyloric valve and not having to worry about dumping, reactive hypoglycemia, etc. Also, the thought of another major surgery is not thrilling me. Anyway, my surgeon gave me the cost for both Stretta ($5,000) and conversion ($100,000). We decided to seek approval for conversion just to have it in our back pocket while we appeal the denial to my state Department of Insurance. Wouldn't you know it, they approved the $100,000 surgery. This is a prime example of what's wrong with the insurance industry. Why would you approve a $100,000 solution to a $5,000 problem???? Just frustrated beyond belief and knew this was a good place to get out my aggression . . . here and in my kickboxing class where I visualize the Ins. co's medical director's face as my target!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ugh! It makes no sense! I really really hate insurance companies. I had to self-pay for my VSG because my insurance company would only approve WLS with a documented BMI over 40 for 5 years. Well I had managed to lose 90 pounds on my own about 4 years prior to pursuing VSG and my BMI had JUST crept back up over 40. So they wouldn't approve me for surgery because I had at least TRIED to lose weight on my own? I felt like the were punishing me for trying to do it without surgery. My options were to stay fat for 5 more years or just pay for it myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't about the $$, it's about a proven procedure vs. an experimental one. Your insurance policy probably has a clause that excludes experimental or investigational treatments.

I'm sorry you're upset, really. I hope your appeal comes through.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't about the $$, it's about a proven procedure vs. an experimental one. Your insurance policy probably has a clause that excludes experimental or investigational treatments.

I'm sorry you're upset, really. I hope your appeal comes through.

I'm a lawyer practicing insurance law, so get all about exclusions. There is no experimental carve out in my policy. And, at this point, stretta shouldn't be considered experimental as its well accepted in the medical community and has been shown to be a viable fix for GERD for close to 10 years. What bothers me the most is that they insurance company is forcing me into a potentially life-altering procedure when there's an available fix with little to no risk. Penny wise, dollar foolish. I'm planning on paying for the procedure, but will not abandon my appeal with the Department of Insurance because I'm hoping that by appealing, I can do my part to make this procedure more readily available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry you're going through this. Insurance can be complicated and make no sense to us mere mortals..

Edited by melyssafaye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me, but the insurer isn't "forcing" you to do anything - insurance merely says what they will, or won't, pay for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me, but the insurer isn't "forcing" you to do anything - insurance merely says what they will, or won't, pay for.

And forgive me for my poor choice of words. I'm lucky in that I have options since I have the resources to pay for a procedure that likely will prevent me from developing esophageal cancer, as that's where I'm heading since there is so much stomach acid splashing up damaging my esophagus. But in my view, the insurance company sure as hell is forcing me (or those like me who don't have the financial ability to pay for the procedure) to convert to bypass, and face the potential side effects/surgical risks if I want to "cure" the problem by utilizing the benefits I pay for. Like I said, I'm very fortunate that I can pull out my checkbook and have the procedure tomorrow. But I pay for an insurance policy and I would like the individuals who work for that company to pull their heads out of their assholes and (1) read my medical records; (2) approve medication that offers some relief of my symptoms rather than insist that I try Omeprazole or other lower level PPIs which provide no relief (a fact that is reflected in my medical records); and (3) stop insisting on a medical procedure that I CAN'T HAVE because of my lack of a fundus. I would be more accepting if there was some actual thought behind the denial. So, you're right. The company is not "forcing" me to accept their very generous offer to pay for a conversion to bypass. Except they kinda are, if I want any insurance coverage. They've presented me with the textbook definition of a Hobson's Choice, since they disclaimed liability for any alternative treatments. I pity the poor person who doesn't have the financial means to make decisions regarding their care without relying on insurance coverage. Sorry if my position regarding the workings of insurance companies in the healthcare arena is distasteful to your sensibilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't about the $$, it's about a proven procedure vs. an experimental one. Your insurance policy probably has a clause that excludes experimental or investigational treatments.

I'm sorry you're upset, really. I hope your appeal comes through.

The sleeve was classified as experimental a few years ago, until they realized it was cheaper option with fewer complications than RNY.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgive me, but the insurer isn't "forcing" you to do anything - insurance merely says what they will, or won't, pay for.

And forgive me for my poor choice of words. I'm lucky in that I have options since I have the resources to pay for a procedure that likely will prevent me from developing esophageal cancer, as that's where I'm heading since there is so much stomach acid splashing up damaging my esophagus. But in my view, the insurance company sure as hell is forcing me (or those like me who don't have the financial ability to pay for the procedure) to convert to bypass, and face the potential side effects/surgical risks if I want to "cure" the problem by utilizing the benefits I pay for. Like I said, I'm very fortunate that I can pull out my checkbook and have the procedure tomorrow. But I pay for an insurance policy and I would like the individuals who work for that company to pull their heads out of their assholes and (1) read my medical records; (2) approve medication that offers some relief of my symptoms rather than insist that I try Omeprazole or other lower level PPIs which provide no relief (a fact that is reflected in my medical records); and (3) stop insisting on a medical procedure that I CAN'T HAVE because of my lack of a fundus. I would be more accepting if there was some actual thought behind the denial. So, you're right. The company is not "forcing" me to accept their very generous offer to pay for a conversion to bypass. Except they kinda are, if I want any insurance coverage. They've presented me with the textbook definition of a Hobson's Choice, since they disclaimed liability for any alternative treatments. I pity the poor person who doesn't have the financial means to make decisions regarding their care without relying on insurance coverage. Sorry if my position regarding the workings of insurance companies in the healthcare arena is distasteful to your sensibilities.

A lot people that post here think Drs are Gods also and people should be grateful for whatever Drs what to do for or with them, not realizing they are paid professionals like everyone else.

I work for myself and I am moderately comfortable so I have more options when it comes to healthcare than most people. If you lack financial means, healthcare really sucks.

In your position I would just pay out of pocket for the surgery I want and avoid the gastric bypass.

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As of 2013, stretta was covered by Medicare in 12 states, by Tricare and the VA, and by select other commercial carriers. Medicare doesn't cover experimental procedures, so perhaps you can use that info in your appeal.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stretta-procedure-for-gerd-successful-10-year-follow-up-data-presented-at-digestive-disease-week--sustained-improvement-long-term-efficacy-208047551.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My question:

What is your bariatric surgeon willing to do for you???

Is he/she going to insist on a doctor to doctor conference call with your insurance company?

Remember that most of the time an "approval" or a "denial" is already "templated" for whoever receives your request onto their station/desk--usually not a medical doctor of any kind.

Your surgeon can take the easy way out and just accept your self pay offer OR she/he can and should have the facts and figures to stand behind his diagnosis and plan of treatment, then be willing to pick up the phone and "fight" for what he/she thinks is what is in your best interest.

That takes the $ out of the equation and replaces it with what is best for YOU.

If you truly think that a RNY is not for you, than stand firm and fight---being damned sure your surgeon is willing to do the same. Otherwise, in my opinion, you need a different surgeon.

You can always self pay (your words), but here and now, you have the opportunity to do the "right thing". Others following down the same path for years to come will be grateful that you fought the fight not only for yourself, but for them (who probably would not have the privilege of self paying).

"Integrity is doing the right thing when no one is watching"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My surgeon is by no means taking the easy way out. My insurance company has a no appeal policy on this procedure. So, while my surgeon has requested a peer to peer review, it has been refused twice. My surgeon is working with me and the legal team from the stretta manufacturer to appeal to my state Dept. of Insurance seeking an independent medical review. My surgeon is behind me 100%. There should be no question in anyone's mind that my surgeon isn't working for me. He's already done more than most when it comes to this fight.

One of the reasons I filed with the Dept of Insurance rather than pay for my procedure and be on my merry way is because I don't believe an insurance company should be able to blanket deny procedures and/or medications without justification. I'm fighting through the Dept. of Insurance so maybe the next person who has this problem will be able to get the treatment they need without the struggle.

Sent from my iPhone using the BariatricPal App

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As of 2013, stretta was covered by Medicare in 12 states, by Tricare and the VA, and by select other commercial carriers. Medicare doesn't cover experimental procedures, so perhaps you can use that info in your appeal.

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/stretta-procedure-for-gerd-successful-10-year-follow-up-data-presented-at-digestive-disease-week--sustained-improvement-long-term-efficacy-208047551.html

Thank you so much! I have an appointment tomorrow with the VP of reimbursement for the company that manufacturers stretta. They have agreed to partner with me and fight the insurance company through the Dept. of Insurance. This is precisely the type of information I need to present in my appeal

Sent from my iPhone using the BariatricPal App

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck on your appeal. I hope it all works out.

pam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No appeal policy? Wow. What state are you in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Trending Products

  • Trending Topics

  • Recent Status Updates

    • rinabobina

      I would like to know what questions you wish you had asked prior to your duodenal switch surgery?
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • cryoder22

      Day 1 of pre-op liquid diet (3 weeks) and I'm having a hard time already. I feel hungry and just want to eat. I got the protein and supplements recommend by my program and having a hard time getting 1 down. My doctor / nutritionist has me on the following:
      1 protein shake (bariatric advantage chocolate) with 8 oz of fat free milk 1 snack = 1 unjury protein shake (root beer) 1 protein shake (bariatric advantage orange cream) 1 snack = 1 unjury protein bar 1 protein shake (bariatric advantace orange cream or chocolate) 1 snack = 1 unjury protein soup (chicken) 3 servings of sugar free jello and popsicles throughout the day. 64 oz of water (I have flavor packets). Hot tea and coffee with splenda has been approved as well. Does anyone recommend anything for the next 3 weeks?
      · 1 reply
      1. NickelChip

        All I can tell you is that for me, it got easier after the first week. The hunger pains got less intense and I kind of got used to it and gave up torturing myself by thinking about food. But if you can, get anything tempting out of the house and avoid being around people who are eating. I sent my kids to my parents' house for two weeks so I wouldn't have to prepare meals I couldn't eat. After surgery, the hunger was totally gone.

    • buildabetteranna

      I have my final approval from my insurance, only thing holding up things is one last x-ray needed, which I have scheduled for the fourth of next month, which is my birthday.

      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • BetterLeah

      Woohoo! I have 7 more days till surgery, So far I am already down a total of 20lbs since I started this journey. 
      · 1 reply
      1. NeonRaven8919

        Well done! I'm 9 days away from surgery! Keep us updated!

    • Ladiva04

      Hello,
      I had my surgery on the 25th of June of this year. Starting off at 117 kilos.😒
      · 1 reply
      1. NeonRaven8919

        Congrats on the surgery!

  • Recent Topics

  • Hot Products

  • Sign Up For
    Our Newsletter

    Follow us for the latest news
    and special product offers!
  • Together, we have lost...
      lbs

    PatchAid Vitamin Patches

    ×