who supports right to choose

[BJean 16]

I don't doubt for one minute that you're not making this stuff up, gadget. Why would we doubt your sincerity or sources? Because they're so outrageous? No, we've come to expect it here on this thread. It comes with the territory of the abortion discussion. We're used to it. No one has to be reasonable or sane here. Craziness seems to come with the territory. We just have to be passionate. And no one can deny our passion in this discussion, can they?

Oh wait, I signed off. I'm going to try again, even if someone finds something even more outrageous to post. And I'm sure that is possible. Where's that beating a dead horse icon when you need it?

[gadgetlady 4]

I don't doubt for one minute that you're not making this stuff up, gadget. Why would we doubt your sincerity or sources? Because they're so outrageous? No, we've come to expect it here on this thread. It comes with the territory of the abortion discussion. We're used to it. No one has to be reasonable or sane here. Craziness seems to come with the territory. We just have to be passionate. And no one can deny our passion in this discussion, can they?

Oh wait, I signed off. I'm going to try again, even if someone finds something even more outrageous to post. And I'm sure that is possible. Where's that beating a dead horse icon when you need it?

I gather from your sarcasm that you DO doubt my sources. Go look it up for yourself. They're very well documented. Or just bury your head in the sand if you'd prefer. It doesn't negate the facts that this is reality. This is the road we end up on when we believe one person has the right to define when another person's life begins.

[BJean 16]

I was being serious. I do not doubt that you have solid sources.

My head is never going to be buried in the sand. That's kind of an odd characterization, actually. Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean that I am unaware of the issues.

Know this. I will never, ever agree with you about taking away women's rights. It doesn't matter how many horrific scenarious or obtuse parallels you dig up.

There will ALWAYS be women who need the abortion option, whether you believe that option is moral or reasonable or not. All the picketing, grisly photos, name-calling, finger-pointing and declarations of when life begins will never change the fact that women will make their choice, one way or other, legal or illegal, for themselves. I just hope we don't go back to shooting doctors outside their clinics again. Because this time, I believe some people are going to shoot back.

[gadgetlady 4]

All the picketing, grisly photos, name-calling, finger-pointing and declarations of when life begins will never change the fact that women will make their choice, one way or other, legal or illegal, for themselves.

Making abortion illegal would not eliminate it (just as making other forms of murder illegal doesn't eliminate them), but it would certainly take a big chunk out. The whole "if it's illegal people will still do it anyway" argument has never flown with me. It's illogical. People always break the law; we don't therefore abandon laws. That's called anarchy.

[marjon9 6]

This is the road we end up on when we believe one person has the right to define when another person's life begins.

Ah, the irony. Truly breathtaking.

[BJean 16]

Gasp. I agree Mark. It's terribly hard to appreciate the backward reasoning.

[gadgetlady 4]

Ah, the irony. Truly breathtaking.

Why, pray tell? I believe science should determine when human life begins, and allowing people to decide willy-nilly based on their own personal conscience leads to things like infanticide, euthanasia, and slavery.

[BJean 16]

What is life? How do you define life? Of course it is science. And why do you get to be in control?

Why do you get to decide who gets help and who suffers and dies? Because one life is supported by another life, but it has no vocal ability makes it acceptable for you to speak for them? You can say what they want and deserve in spite of the potential death of another person? I don't think so.

You're not the person who knows how to make medical decisions in life or death situations in each and every case for everyone else. You don't get to decide who should or should not be euthanized or aborted. You get to decide for yourself. Period.

Stop appointing yourself God or Mother Earth, or savior or whatever life saving moniker you've decided you deserve.

[gadgetlady 4]

What is life? How do you define life? Of course it is science. And why do you get to be in control?

Why do you get to decide who gets help and who suffers and dies? Because one life is supported by another life, but it has no vocal ability makes it acceptable for you to speak for them? You can say what they want and deserve in spite of the potential death of another person? I don't think so.

You're not the person who knows how to make medical decisions in life or death situations in each and every case for everyone else. You don't get to decide who should or should not be euthanized or aborted. You get to decide for yourself. Period.

If you don't believe in slavery, don't own a slave. You would have been great 150 years ago -- those are the exact arguments slaveowners used!

[gadgetlady 4]

The point is you are deciding for another person. Ever heard of Gianna Jenssen? Google her. Her mother "chose" to have a saline abortion in 1977. Gianna survived it. No surprise, she's a huge pro-life activist. At the time of the abortion, no one asked her how she felt about her mother's (or, I guess you'd call it her "owner's) "choice". That "choice" almost killed her. It is more often successful -- 1/2 of the people going into an abortion clinic don't come out alive.

[marjon9 6]

Why, pray tell? I believe science should determine when human life begins, and allowing people to decide willy-nilly based on their own personal conscience leads to things like infanticide, euthanasia, and slavery.

Believe whatever you want, it's fine with me. Fortunately you are not allowed to force your beliefs, willy nilly, on other people.

[green 6]

I had my pregnant stray cat spayed and aborted at the same time. Does this mean that I am going to Hell?

[gadgetlady 4]

I had my pregnant stray cat spayed and aborted at the same time. Does this mean that I am going to Hell?

I thought you didn't believe in hell

I do have a serious question, though, green. If abortion had been illegal in France when you found yourself facing an unplanned pregnancy, what would you have done?

[marjon9 6]

I had my pregnant stray cat spayed and aborted at the same time. Does this mean that I am going to Hell?

Not with those big feet.

[SlimTarnishedDiva 1]

If you don't believe in slavery, don't own a slave. You would have been great 150 years ago -- those are the exact arguments slaveowners used!

Gadget, for the moment can you stop evoking slaves and slavery into your postings...it is making me rather uncomfortable.To your earlier comment that you don't believe that if abortions were illegal, women would still have them. Of course they would, remember when abortions were illegal before...many abortions were performed in folks kitchens. Or should we all become The Duggar family?!?