Jump to content
×
Are you looking for the BariatricPal Store? Go now!

Gastric Bypass or Lap Band - can't decide



Recommended Posts

Hey all,

Yep - can't decide.

If I get the Gastric I'll have to deal with maybe major complications, losing it too fast (loose skin) etc BUT it sounds like I WILL lose it.

The Lap Band makes more sense .. but I see some people are having trouble losing because of their diet/exercise. I'm afraid I'll be one of those!!!

If I'm going go under the knife - I only want to do this once and I want it to work.

Any thoughts?

Bella

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would never consider gastric bypass, because of the dumping syndrome and malabsorbtion issues, but it has to be your choice what you want. I don't want my intestines re-routed and the band gives me that option. This is a very personal decision you have to make for yourself. No one else can do it for you. Read all you can on both procedures, but I think in the long run you will choose the safest one which is the band. Everyone doesn't have more than one surgery. A lot of people never come to the forum and are out there very contently living life with their bands. Others like to keep in touch with one another how they are doing, and yes those that have problems come here to ask questions and get answers. It is a support forum as well as just general talk about the band. There are issues with the band of course. There is always port infection, slippage, or erosion, but I think the majority of people would tell you if they had to do it again they would choose the band. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think most people would....anyway best of luck to you whatever you choose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hello Bella, if you asked for my opinion, go for the la-band, i also want to have it, i hope in the next weeks i will be a new lap-banded. I think the lap-band is more secure than the gastric by-pass, and don-t worry about not loosing weight, i think with the minimum effort, we will loose weight.better have some walks in the park, than risking your life, because in the gastric by-pass, the risks are bigger, an the operation is irreversible......compared to the lap-band, which you can remove any time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

First...the need for plastic surgery has WAY more to do with how overweight someone is and how LONG that condition lasted than it does with how fast someone loses weight. I lost slowly with the band and needed PS. I REGAINED and am losing quickly with DS and may need more PS...not because I'm losing quickly, but because the skin is stretched beyond its capacity to return to normal. Most doctors will tell you that if you have been 100 pounds overweight for any period of time, you WILL need plastic surgery.

Then...the band is a safer SURGERY. And a shorter SURGERY. But, for me, for the surgery to be successful, I have to be NOT morbily obese when it's all said and done. To have ANY wls--even a "safe" one--and still be very obese or morbidly obese is NOT--to me--"safe." I got the band, went from MO to just O, started having complications and regained most of the weight. I had the band removed during a revision to DS and have NEVER been happier with a decision...except, maybe, that I waited so long to do it.

About the "rerouted" comments...my band--and I am the exception, not the rule, to be sure--was rearranging my innards and causing them to malfunction. My esophagus worked only intermittently. It recovered, about 2.5 months after having the band removed, but it was miserable to live that way. Also--and again, I may be the exception--I can eat most foods now and I had a VERY limited diet while banded.

I have to take lifelong supplements. Because I will have lifetime malabsorption. Which means that, for the rest of my life, a certain percentage of the foods I eat won't "count." Not for good (nutrients), not for bad (fats and cholesterol.)

Good luck with your decision. But there are more than two wls's out there, so don't forget to consider the DS as well. Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I definitely think the band is the safer surgery and you do lose the weight much more slowly and healthily. However, I don't think the band is the "life long" surgery it was told it was to me. And is definitely a lot more work personally.

So many people need corrections, revisions and work that it requires more surgeries. One of my main issues is that I only wanted to have ONE surgery. And I am possibly looking at more now if I were to erode, slip, port replacement, etc... I didn't really get told that was a large possibility. Even Inamed says that it is not a lifetime surgery and the chances are high for additional surgeries needed with the band. Had I known that, I don't know if I would have gotten the band. If I had to do it all over again, I would just take the plunge into RNY rather than the band. But I have my band now, so I am trying to not worry about "what if's" and just deal with it while I have it. But I do feel that it isn't a case of IF I lose the band, but WHEN.

Both my sister and mother have RNY bypass. They do look great and have lost A LOT of weight and are maintaining (sister for about 6 years, mom for about 3). They don't struggle too much with their diet as they are now in a routine. The dumping or vomiting is very minimal. And it is usually when they eat something that they didn't know what was in it or it was a funky type of food that just didn't agree with them. Neither of them have any other issues that make life unbearable. I ask my mom if she would do it again or would she try my lap band first, and she would go the RNY route. She likes that it is forever and that it is permanant. She said that I can eat "around" my band and "pack" my pouch and she would have done that, therefore not being successful at the surgery.

Good luck with your choices!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My question to you would be: Are you more concerned with losing a portion of your excess weight 'safely' and slowly or are you more focused on seeing all or most of that excess weight get off, no matter what.

Will you be happy if you only lose 50% of the 100# you hope to lose?

Answering that question will help you to keep weighing your options.

Like you I had a (relatively) lower start weight. I was only aiming to lose 70-80# overall so I thought the LapBand had a chance to get me there.

I preferred to have the LapBand although I had a full approval for either WLS. I did not consider the DS (which is popular with some) as it was not a good fit for my lifestyle, start weight, weight loss goals or as a good option for a surgery that local doctors in my area were very familiar with.

  • The positives for the LapBand were exactly what you mentioned: the less intestinal rerouting, shorter/less complex surgery, adjustability, lack of malabsorption, lack of 'dumping', the fact that it is not permanent, etc. I saw the LapBand in Europe where it has some real success. But European LapBanders tend to be a bit smaller when they get the surgery than we are here in the US. (Yes, statistics back this up. It's almost done as an obesity preventative outside of the US, where here we sometimes view WLS as a sort of last resort.)

  • The downsides of the LapBand were the slower rate of loss, the possibility of little/no loss and the possibility of GERD-type symptoms after banding.

So I know the same stats you know, but honestly since you're trying to lose 100# with the LapBand I would caution you to keep weighing your options carefully.

ALL (yes, all) of the many RnY bypass patients I know that needed to lose 100# or more - have lost the weight. They've had ups and downs but of the 11 or 12 people I personally know with RnY they *all* lost nearly all of their excess weight. Yes, every single one of them lost 100# and only one has 10-20# more to lose.

Now of my friends with LapBands, the stats aren't as high. I know 18 to 20 friends who have tried to lose 100# with the band. So far, of those (counting friends, acquaintances, and etc) I can count 7 who have lost 100# with the LapBand. Unfortunately 2 of them need to lose another 50-100# so they lost "that magic 100" but they are no where near being at/near their goal. You know what's so funny - of those 7 people, now 5 of them work in the weight loss surgery field. They're such exceptions that they are literally employed in the industry now. That's how rare they are.

Again, this is my perspective - but that said, I am admittedly waiting to hear if I am going to have to

1) get another LapBand or get this one repaired or put back in place

2) just get the band removed and get revised to another surgery (an RnY)

Well, now I speak as someone who never, not in five years of diet, exercise and trying to be a good LapBand citizen - has come close to goal.

Forget the life-threatening complications (we know RnY bypass patients sometimes suffer those but no RnY patient I know has ever been as sick as I was after I had the LapBand. Seriously. But then I'm an exception.)

the thing to me is - I'm still fat. It's just not that I suffered complications that would have killed other people - it's the irony that I had an operation that was supposedly 'safer' yet ended up been hospitalized anyway - and even after I fully recovered, I *STILL* can't get the weight off. That really gets me - not to mention it's frustrating to still be obese (at a BMI of 30) after a 5-year "Battle of the Band." So I'm like - gee, even with the RnY I'd still be closer to my goal weight.

Now as for the dumping thing. Bandsters love to point at dumping as another reason they'd never have RnY.

Guess what.

I've suffered (as has every other long term banded patient) "stuck food" or "PB" incidents that rival the dumping syndrome that RnY patients experience and it ain't pretty. When Bandsters say "oh I'd never want dumping" I can understand it. But we do get things feeling a bit stuck, we do occasionally experience "the golf ball" syndrome and yes some of us suffer from "PB's" or sliming.

Why we like to feel these incidents are better than dumping, I don't know.

So always consider that there are consequences to any WLS and sometimes these incidents happen at work, restaurants or in public. It does happen. Not always, not daily, not frequently - but it does happen.

If I had it to do all over again and I was told " you won't lose more than XXX pounds with the LapBand" then I would have had the RnY with only minimal reservations.

I need to get the weight off - so all of this, "Oh I'd have the Band or nothing" was not the approach I took. I needed a tool to help me lose weight and so far, the band hasn't gotten there. Check me in a few months, maybe things will change and my view will change too. But I am happy to see people give great consideration to finding the right tool for them - no matter which one they picked.

So I often feel like my banded friends who are trying to lose 100# plus are struggling more, working harder and not seeing the same success. Seriously. All Bandsters who don't lose all their weight are NOT lazy. We like to say that as banded patients because it makes us feel better about our potential to succeed. But my most successful banded pals who are aiming to lose 50-60# are doing much better. They are seeing much better success. The LapBand is a great tool for losing a portion of your excess weight.

I realize many successful Bandsters will chime in and refute my opinions (that's what they are, although stats do back up the LapBand success rate) but those LapBanders who lose almost all of the excess weight are the exceptions to the rule - not the norm. This really is a fact. Period.

So if you were hoping to lose 50#, 60#, 70# - it might be different. I think LapBands is a wonderful weight loss option. It really can be life improving, life changing and such a positive tool.

But for the magic "century" mark I hope you please consider that for the VERY unscientific sample of people I know, the RnY bypass patients did it across the board. It doesn't mean this is a reason to go with the RnY but if you are concerned about the overall success rate, just please consider your options carefully.

Thanks for sticking with this little novel of a post and good look with your decision either way.

Happy Banded (and Non-Banded) Journeys to everyone...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, this is an interesting thread. I have about 140 pounds to lose and am just now researching lab-banding. Of all the WLS out there, this seemed the least scary with the fewest side effects. Now I am curious to hear from other members of the board who have over 100 pounds to lose their opinions of the band. I am going tomorrow night to an informational seminar at St. Vincent's hospital and hoping to have many questions answered there. Right now, I see my biggest optical as being insurance. If BC/BS won't approve me, there is no way I could afford to go private pay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NewSho...

I've been on the "band boards" for four years, and I think yours is the best answer I've read on this topic.

Sue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great topic!

I think it's an individual choice. Please do the research because for me RnY Open or Laperscopic(sp?) was not an option. When I found out about the band I was so delighted. I may not lose the weight based on the governments chart but I will lose based on what I want and I am happy about that.

All I can say is research, research and more research.

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had it to do all over again and I was told " you won't lose more than XXX pounds with the LapBand" then I would have had the RnY with only minimal reservations.

This is just such a personal decision I don't know what anyone else can say that will help. For example, NewSho's comment above doesn't ring at ALL true for me, since all I wanted was to lose XXX pounds as safely as humanly possible. That number, XXX, is equal to whatever I could lose that would leave me lighter than the 340 I started with. That was my priority.

Keeping the weight off was priority # 2 for me. (Losing it quickly wasn't even on the list. See how our priorities differ?) And I felt that banding, with its longer-term action of behavior modification, stood me a better chance of that over RNY. The fact that RNY guarantees weight loss almost in spite of what the patient eats seems to me a lose-lose situation, so to speak. Once that malapsorptive action lessens, after 12-18 months or so, unless I'd learned a whole new way to eat the weight would just come back on. And I know I couldn't be sure of learning a whole new way to eat unless there were significant negative repercussions to overeating. Dumping isn't something to count on--it only happens on certain foods and to certain people; it's by no means a sure thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your comments.

I do agree that RnY bypass stomach pouches can eventually (and sometimes should) increase in size. One of the downsides has alway been that this pouch increase can not be fixed without some re-surgery.

Well, now more and more RnY surgeons have started outfitted these increased pouches with a... LapBand. Ironic, eh? Sometimes the surgeons put a new LapBand on top of bypass patients' pouches.

But even more progressive surgeons now outfit their RnY bypass surgeons with a LapBand *at the time* of their original surgery. This has most of the benefits of the RnY bypass and the benefits of LapBanding. In fact, early research does show that these dual-form patients (I call them 'hybrids' but some docs call them RnY/LapBand patients) who get both from the start - have a higher loss rate than either RnY alone or LapBand alone. It might literally be the best of both worlds.

There are some surgeons (like some in Florida) who give all their RnY patients a LapBand from the beginning and although this operation costs more - the long term loss rate is higher and they can have the benefits of adjusting the pouch size with the LapBand. It really does seem like a great solution for some patients. I know a patient with a hybrid and she's lost 90 lbs in 10 months - but the best thing is that she can have adjustments if she ever gets needs them after her 'active RnY losing period' slows down.

Hopefully this procedure will catch on as an option for those who feel they may want the adjustability of the LapBand plus the malabsorptive aspects of the RnY .

Happy Banded (and Non-Banded) Journeys to everyone...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Trending Products

  • Trending Topics

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Alisa_S

      Saw my PCP & officially started my 6 month supervised diet 07/26/24. She just told me to eat less carbs & sugar, use the air fryer and not fry my foods in grease, and to try to walk 30 minutes 3 days a week & if I can't do that (and I cannot), to walk 10 minutes daily. Told me to walk fast enough that my heart rate is raised.  She didn't give me a number as far as calories though. A year or so ago I was doing low carb/sugar free and keeping my calories at 1800 or below. She said I should up my cals to 2000 at that time, so that's what I'm shooting for now.
      Hubby walked with me today. He's in pretty bad shape so I was surprised he wanted to. We walked down the gravel road at a pretty good pace (for us LOL). 10 minutes walking and my heart rate was 115bps according to my Fitbit and 125bps according to his pulsometer. Either way, it was elevated and I was breathing hard. Doesn't sound like a lot, but it's a start. We'll do it again tomorrow. 😁
      I should be hearing from the surgeon soon. She said if I didn't, to call him next week. Since I HAVE to do the 6 month diet & that's going to put me into January by the time it's done, I'm hoping the surgeon will let me do all my testing in January. I don't want to do it all now and have my deductible get met, only to have to pay the deductible again in January or February for my surgery. Praying that things go the way I hope. 🙏
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • stanley_imarc

      IMARC Group’s report titled “Alternative Sweeteners Market Report by Product Type (High Fructose Syrup, High-Intensity Sweeteners, Low-Intensity Sweeteners), Source (Natural, Synthetic), Application (Food, Beverages, and Others), and Region 2024-2032”. The global alternative sweeteners market size reached US$ 4.9 Billion in 2023. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach US$ 7.0 Billion by 2032, exhibiting a growth rate (CAGR) of 4.05% during 2024-2032.
      Grab a sample PDF of this report: https://www.imarcgroup.com/alternative-sweeteners-market/requestsample
      Factors Affecting the Growth of the Alternative Sweeteners Industry:
      Health Consciousness: The increasing awareness among individuals about the health issues linked to high sugar consumption, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases, is supporting the market growth. Consumers are becoming more health-conscious and seeking products that can provide sweetness without the negative health effects associated with sugar. This shift in consumer preferences is leading to a greater demand for low-calorie and natural sweeteners like stevia, monk fruit, and erythritol. These sweeteners offer the added benefit of having minimal impact on blood glucose levels, making them suitable for diabetic and health-conscious individuals.
      Technological Advancements: Innovations in the production and formulation of alternative sweeteners are impelling the market growth. Advancements in biotechnology and food science are leading to the development of high-intensity sweeteners with improved taste profiles and functional properties. Innovations in fermentation processes enhance the production efficiency and quality of natural sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit. These technological improvements are making alternative sweeteners more appealing to both manufacturers and consumers. Enhanced stability, solubility, and sweetness intensity allow these sweeteners to be used in a wide range of products, ranging from beverages to baked goods.
      Consumer Trends and Preferences: Evolving consumer trends and preferences are playing a significant role in driving the alternative sweeteners market. The growing demand for clean-label products, which are healthier and free from artificial ingredients, is offering a favorable market outlook. Consumers are increasingly seeking natural and plant-based sweeteners, aligning with broader trends toward plant-based diets and veganism. Besides this, there is an increase in the demand for low-calorie and sugar-free alternatives that support weight management and overall wellness. Food and beverage companies are responding to these trends by innovating and expanding their product lines to include options sweetened with alternative sweeteners, thereby catering to changing tastes and health concerns of modern consumers.
      Alternative Sweeteners Market Report Segmentation:
      By Product Type:
      High Fructose Syrup High-Intensity Sweeteners Low-Intensity Sweeteners High-intensity sweeteners represent the largest segment as they require only a fraction of the quantity to achieve the desired sweetness.
      By Source:
      Natural Synthetic On the basis of the source, the market has been bifurcated into natural and synthetic.
      By Application:
      Food Beverages Others Food accounts for the largest market share due to the rising utilization of sweeteners in a wide variety of food products.  
      Regional Insights:
      North America (United States, Canada) Asia Pacific (China, Japan, India, South Korea, Australia, Indonesia, Others) Europe (Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Russia, Others) Latin America (Brazil, Mexico, Others) Middle East and Africa Asia Pacific region enjoys a leading position in the alternative sweeteners market on account of changing lifestyles of individuals.    
      Global Alternative Sweeteners Market Trends:
      Governing agencies and health organizations of several countries are implementing policies to reduce sugar consumption as they recognize its detrimental health impacts. Various regulatory bodies are approving alternative sweeteners for use, ensuring their safety and efficacy. These approvals provide food and beverage manufacturers with the confidence to incorporate alternative sweeteners into their products. Additionally, initiatives like sugar taxes in several countries are pushing companies to seek healthier alternatives to traditional sugar.   
      Furthermore, advancements in production techniques are making some alternative sweeteners more cost-competitive than traditional sugar. Consumers are becoming more concerned about the environmental impact of traditional sugar production and preferring more sustainable alternative sweeteners.
      Note: If you need specific information that is not currently within the scope of the report, we will provide it to you as a part of the customization.
      About Us
      IMARC Group is a leading market research company that offers management strategy and market research worldwide. We partner with clients in all sectors and regions to identify their highest-value opportunities, address their most critical challenges, and transform their businesses.
      IMARC Group’s information products include major market, scientific, economic and technological developments for business leaders in pharmaceutical, industrial, and high technology organizations. Market forecasts and industry analysis for biotechnology, advanced materials, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, travel and tourism, nanotechnology and novel processing methods are at the top of the company’s expertise.
      Contact US
      IMARC Group
      134 N 4th St. Brooklyn, NY 11249, USA
      Email: sales@imarcgroup.com
      Tel No:(D) +91 120 433 0800
      United States: +1–631–791–1145 | United Kingdom: +44–753–713–2163

      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
    • Luis E. Lara

      Hi everyone, I'm nerw here ☺️
      · 1 reply
      1. Alisa_S

        Welcome!

        I've been a member since 2008, but just now decided to go ahead with surgery. Barely getting started 😁

    • Liz R

      Trying to update my ticker - I'm down 100 pounds!! 
      · 1 reply
      1. Alisa_S

        I don't know how to update the ticker, but CONGRATULATIONS!!!

    • Alisa_S

      I joined BariatricPal in 2008 & I FINALLY made the descision to have WLS!! I'm so excited & not sure what I need to do to get the ball rolling, but I made an appointment with my PCP for 7/19. It's a start I guess.
      · 0 replies
      1. This update has no replies.
  • Recent Topics

  • Hot Products

  • Sign Up For
    Our Newsletter

    Follow us for the latest news
    and special product offers!
  • Together, we have lost...
      lbs

    PatchAid Vitamin Patches

    ×