lisah25

Thanks Missy. I did some reading, doesn't sound too serious. If it happens again, I'll go to my doctor. It was a little disconcerting when he said that if it didn't resolve in 30 mins, to go to the ER. Otherwise, I was fine. Seems like there should have been something between those extremes!

That is odd! It didn't hurt, until later when I got a headache. Things just looked so odd for a while. Do you know any treatment for them?

I personally will be THRILLED when I don't have to watch ads on TV, shift through all the flyers in the mail and not get phone calls!!!

Based on the intelligence they were allowed to see...

Of course I knew that you knew. I think, ya know! :phanvan I totally agree, there are good and bad on both sides, and so often it seems like it's the same-old with just the names and R/D affiliation that changes. You have a smart kid!

Much of the world couldn't begin to understand why such an issue was made here over Clinton getting a BJ. As you say, they have very definite opinions about Bush.

True, and of course politians are good at feeding into our fears and concerns. But I don't get the "I wouldn't vote for ___" because of the people supporting them/it/that. There is more then enough nastiness on both sides.

Rants and Raves is just that. A place to talk about non-weight loss issues, to "Gripe, complain, moan, fight, rant and rave.".

Because he ran a good campaign. Because he told people what they wanted to hear. Because people were tired of the scandals during Dem. Clinton's administration, and were promised a change if Reps were elected. Because many didn't think it was a good idea to change presidents mid-war. Because we don't have a history of making the best choices always in our elections. Or other reasons I don't know. I personally don't think he's stupid. I do think he's a terrible leader.

Well, Bush isn't up for re-election. Also, I would HOPE that people who are undecided would decide on issues and stances of the politians that are running, not anyone else.

Honestly, it didn't play that big a role. I don't think I would have done the surgery just for vanity. That said, I'm enjoying wearing smaller clothes, and having people tell me I look better. It's a nice side-effect!

I couldn't eat less and lose weight without surgery. Not for any length of time. I tried everything, and nothing worked long term. This is working, so far, and much better then anything else I've done. There are physical things having a band does for you, at least I'm noticing changes. You eat less of course, because it restricts how much you eat. But it also reduced my desire for a lot of junk food. I can walk by most of it indifferently. It's not calling my name anymore. I really enjoy my food when I'm hungry, but when I'm not, I just don't want it. That NEVER happened before, no matter what plan I was following. There is a very real physical change in me that has nothing to do with my willpower or desire to lose or anything like that. Why do you feel their support is needed, if you are of age and have the resoures to do it? You might not get it, are you able to go ahead anyway?

Yes and Yes. I believe we all do. It may not be based on race or gender, but I think we all some group of people we are prejudiced against, and that we discrimate against.

To me, it doesn't even matter if the Bible is as clear as crystal or mud. If some people believe it with all their heart, mind and soul and others don't. What I don't get is why it's OK to make laws based on someone's beliefs, that affect people who don't share them, when I don't see any overriding societial reason to do so.

Back in 1997(I think) Billy Graham was on 20/20. And said this: http://www.publiceye.org/ifas/fw/9705/update.html “Downs then asked Graham his opinion about homosexuality. Graham responded, "I think the Bible teaches that homosexuality is a sin. But the Bible also teaches that pride is a sin, jealousy is a sin and hate is a sin. And so, I don't think that homosexuality should be chosen as the overwhelming sin that we're doing today."”

Oh, I'm so sorry!

Poor thing - you have the trifecta going! I'm planning to stay in my cubical as much as possible at work today. I know if I venture out, there will be treats everywhere. I've been doing good at not being that interested so far, but the sheer sugar onslaught might just wear me down.

I've always wondered when I read this passage why homosexuals are singled out as it's targets by some. What about all the rest of those listed? I rarely hear them be as condemmed.

I love Harry Potter, I've read all the books, and seen all the movies. It's one of those series I can read more then once, and I'm really wondering how it's all going to end. Which book is your favorite so far?

Keep up the good fight!:clap2: I remember reading somewhere from a RNYer that she was sick and tired of all the mis-information out there about her surgery, then she turned around and said she couldn't have had a lap-band because she didn't want a port sticking out of her skin.:faint:

I agree, a PB can be a great learning tool. My first one wasn't bad, but I knew I didn't want to feel that way again. Took twice more to really learn the lesson, but it was a great negative reinforcement!

Actually, that not always true. DH and I got life insurance last year, a year after his banding. And the premium isn't any higher then it would have been had he not had surgery. In fact, we couldn't get him covered in the past because of his weight. It must vary by company.

You deduct the surgery this year. And remember to deduct all the your medical expense for the year! I had things like what I pay for health insurance, and meds and all that for the whole year I got to deduct. Then, if you finance via a home equity loan, you likely can deduct the interest that you pay on it as well.

I agree, while technically it's vomiting, it's different then when I got sick before the band.

More pathetic, scary and ridiculus then I have words for.