Hi everyone - I'm the new guy. 6'1" 340lbs, 39 years old, male. I've done enough research to know that I want and can commit to the bariatric surgery lifesyle changes. I am just now entering "the surgery pipeline" here in Danbury CT. I have still not made up my mind as to whether to opt for the band or the bypass, and I have a lot of questions. Does anyone regret not doing the bypass? Medical imperatives and comparitive risks aside, does anyone have any views as to which is more appropriate given a specific body-type? See, I have a 44-45 BMI, but my build is kind of like an overweight football player. I've been lifting weights since I was in my teens. I do cardio too. Most of my excess weight is on my hips, butt and mid-section. My arms and legs are pretty muscular. My point is that while I'm 340, and certainly dangerously overweight and carrying around too much fat, some of my "excess body weight" is muscle. So given all that, is the lap-band - which reportedly leads to less and slower weight loss than the bypass - a more plausible option for someone with my build? I think if I could drop to 240 I'd by overjoyed. If I am the type that will follow the diet plan strictly and will exercise frequently, is a 100 lb drop possible with the lap band? reason i ask is that I read some literature that suggested that the average was a 30-40% drop of excess weight, which does not seem like it would be enough. Any responses would be greatly appreciated. Good luck everyone on your own journeys.